NEWHAVEN " Latest News " Transfer of business Objection

Transfer of business Objection

The most important facts in brief:

  • Employees can object to the transfer of the employment contract in the event of a transfer of business. contradict.
  • The consequence of the objection is that the Employment contract still with the previous employer exists.
  • In the event of an objection, there is often a dismissal for operational reasons.

What is the right to object to a transfer of business?

In the event of a transfer of business, employees have the option of to object to the transfer of the employment relationship. With a Transfer of business a business or part of a business is transferred to a purchaser. As a result of the transfer of the business, the employment relationships are also transferred to the acquirer. Employees can object to the transfer of these employment relationships in writing. The objection means that the employment relationship is not transferred to the acquirer, but continues to exist with the transferor.

When is there no right of objection?

There is no right of objection if the Employer no longer exists after the sale. If, for example, the previous employer no longer exists as part of a merger under transformation law or a demerger, there is no right of objection.

If an objection is made even though there is no right of objection, the objection has no legal effect. In particular, this means that a declared objection may not be reinterpreted as a resignation or an offer for a termination agreement.

What is the deadline for filing an objection?

The objection can within one month take place. The one-month period begins when the employee is duly informed by the employer or the acquirer. If the employer or the acquirer does not provide proper notification, the period does not begin to run. However, not all errors prevent the objection period from starting to run. A distinction is made between the following errors:

  • DecisiveIf the notification contains errors that are relevant to the employee's decision, e.g. if relevant information is missing, the objection period does not start to run.
  • Not relevant to the decisionErrors that have no significance for the decision of employees do not prevent the objection period from starting to run.

It is not possible to give a general answer as to which errors are significant for the decision of employees. It depends on the individual case. Accordingly, it makes sense for employers to proceed with particular care.

If the objection period does not begin to run, the right of objection may be forfeited. If forfeiture occurs, the right of objection expires. Forfeiture occurs if the following two conditions are met:

  • Moment of timeThe moment of time is determined by the passage of time. It is necessary that a longer period of time has elapsed.
  • Moment of circumstanceCircumstances are present if the employee behaves in such a way that the employer could assume that no further objection would be made.

The moment of time and the moment of circumstance are interdependent. This means that the more time has passed, the lower the requirements for the moment of circumstance and vice versa.

Until the forfeiture occurs, there is a considerable risk for the transferor. If, for example, the "new" employer is in financial difficulties, employees often declare an objection in order to "switch back" to the previous employer.

What are the consequences of an objection?

If the objection is declared, the Employment contract not transferred to the purchaser. Instead, the employment contract continues to exist with the seller. However, employees should bear in mind that the sale of the business often results in the employee's job being lost. For this reason, there is often a risk of dismissal for operational reasons in the event of an objection. In view of the fact that the entire business is often closed, no social selection is required, meaning that even long-serving employees can be dismissed if they object to the transfer.

FAQ

Consent is not required for the transfer of business. However, employees can object to the transfer of business.

The consequence of objecting to the transfer of business is that the employment contract with the employer continues to exist. Following the objection, the employee is often dismissed for operational reasons, as there are no longer any tasks that the employee can take on.

The transfer of business means that the employment contract is transferred to the purchaser. The employee therefore has a new employer in the future.

In particular, employees who have objected to a transfer of business may be dismissed with notice of change.

After a transfer of business, the usual protection against dismissal applies. The exclusion of dismissals in accordance with Section 613a BGB applies for an unlimited period of time.

Share this post
About the author
Dr. Anne-Kathrin Bertke
Lawyer

Dr. Anne-Kathrin Bertke honed her skills at the most prestigious law firms in her field, where she has led highly complex cases in recent years. These experiences have shaped her approach. At NEWHAVEN, clients can expect excellent and innovative advice.

Professional career

  • Lawyer since 2013, first nine years at Freshfields, then at a leading employment law boutique (Tier One)
  • Secondment to the HR department of Novartis Germany during ongoing restructuring measures
  • Secondment to the "Global Litigation Communications" department (Group-wide crisis communications) of Volkswagen AG
  • Five-month internal investigation at a global insurance company in Switzerland

Academic career

  • Studied at the Bucerius Law School in Hamburg (LL.B. and Dr. jur.) and the University of Texas at Austin, USA, as a scholarship holder of the German National Academic Foundation
  • Doctorate with Professor Dr. Matthias Jacobs (Bucerius Law School) on the topic "On the admissibility of sympathy strikes"
  • Legal clerkship at the Hanseatic Higher Regional Court

Publications and Presentations

Dr. Anne-Kathrin Bertke is a speaker at the IfUS Institute (Institute for Corporate Restructuring and Development) in Heidelberg, where she leads the module "Employment Law Restructuring Measures in Crisis" as part of the "Restructuring and Reorganization Consultant Certificate Course". She is a regular speaker at specialist conferences, most recently at the Center for Labor Relations and Labor Law (ZAAR) in Munich, at the conference of the Labor Law Working Group of the German Bar Association (DAV) and at the local conference of the German Association of Labor Courts, at the Practitioners' Group on Works Constitution Law and at the Federal Association of Labor Lawyers in Companies (BVAU) and provides impetus in publications on key topics in labor law.

Recent lectures and publications deal with the following topics, among others:

  • Employment law in restructuring and insolvency
  • Digitalization in the workplace - data protection and employee co-determination
  • Compliance risk works council remuneration
  • Working time recording
  • Post-contractual non-compete clauses
  • Supply chain compliance and trade secret protection
  • Cross-border conversions and news on the European Company (SE)
  • Whistleblowing and managing directors
  • Directors' liability in the pandemic
  • Occupational health and safety

Voluntary commitment / Memberships

  • As President of the Bucerius Law School Alumni Association (Bucerius Alumni e.V.), Dr. Anne-Kathrin Bertke leads a community of over 2,300 members and is committed to the exchange between academia and practice.
  • Further memberships (selection)
    • Alumni of the Studienstiftung e.V.
    • Labor Law Working Group of the German Bar Association (DAV)
    • German Labor Court Association
    • Hamburg Association for Labor Law e.V.
    • Hamburg Bar Association

Further contributions

News

Liability of GmbH managing directors

Learn more
News

Managing director service contract

Learn more
News

Tag-Along

Learn more
News

Drag-Along

Learn more
News

Sweet Equity

Learn more
News

Bad leaver clause

Learn more